Sign in or 
| Version | User | Scope of changes |
|---|---|---|
| May 6 2007, 1:45 AM EDT (current) | LTownBreakdown | 36 words added, 1 word deleted |
| May 1 2007, 12:57 AM EDT | TheGus | 37 words added |
Changes
Key: Additions Deletions
Q: Parker does well in presenting both sides of two differing viewpoints. Those who praise PowerPoint revel in its simplicity and the way in which it makes work "fun." Those who disagree with its use say that it distances the speaker from the audience, and stifles any real thought "if anyone notices, it's too late - the narrative presses on." Where do we stand on this issue? As students PowerPoints really do help. But in the real world the need to articulate is important. Are there any arguments within Parker's essay that you would seem to agree with more than others?
(daniel)
A:A:I agree that people are starting to rely on the powerpoint as an organizational medium which everyone needs to go by. It is a bit ridiculous. This is causing presentations to become predictable and boring. (Ty)
Q: In what ways has powerpoint changed presentations? Do you completely rely on them? Can you relate to any of the people in this reading that completely rely on them? If so who and why?
(Ty)
A:
